There was no shortage of passion in the stands, nor any lack of commitment on the pitch, and yet, despite the favourable result, I felt strangely flat at the final whistle. Maybe it was due to the realisation that decisions made by referee Chris Foy undoubtedly had a significant impact on the game, or because I felt a certain frustration, evidently shared with many fans around me, that Rangers failed to take the game to Chelsea and so fully exploit their two man advantage. That said, it is often remarked that is harder to play against a team a man down, and Chelsea seemed determined to prove that is harder still to play against a team two men short. Credit must be given for their steely determination and their excellent levels of fitness, if not for their palpable lack of discipline which, it could be argued, ultimately cost them the game. Rangers, for their part, clearly had a game plan which seemed to revolve around closing Chelsea down quickly and so not allowing them time on the ball, whilst looking to hit them on the counter attack. This approach seemed to work well in the early stages of the game, and indeed did result in a one goal lead as early as the tenth minute. Whilst their decision to retain this approach, even with a two man advantage, was questionable – I would have preferred to see more men pushed forward in search of that killer second goal – the composure and discipline displayed by the team during a tense, ill-tempered, fractious second half was commendable, and pivotal to the eventual victory.
My vantage point in the upper tier of the South Africa Road Stand provides me with a good view of the goings–on in the school end of the ground, where interestingly, most of the significant events during the game took place. My initial reaction to David Luiz’s clumsy challenge on Heidar Helguson was that it was a certain penalty. Action replays that I have since viewed suggest the penalty decision was less clear cut, with Helguson, whilst not going down like the proverbial ‘ironing board’, perhaps going to ground a little too easily. José Bosingwa’s dismissal, for his challenge on Shaun Wright-Phillips, initially seemed harsh, but viewed again in slow motion it is evident that it was not simply a case of the two players racing towards Adel Taraabt’s through ball and colliding as I had thought. There is a definite foul committed by Bosingwa, who is clearly last man and whose actions deny Wright-Phillips of a goal scoring opportunity – a sending off offence if you apply the letter of the law.
Drogba’s sending off, resulting from an ugly and dangerous challenge on Taraabt, was clearly not in doubt. Chelsea’s two penalty shouts in the second half seemed justified at the time, though David Luiz’s ridiculous theatrics after being upended in the box did not help his cause. Analysis of all these incidents, both in real time and in slow motion, only serve to emphasise how difficult a job it was for referee Chris Hoy, who of course does not have access to action replays and must make a decision in the heat of the moment. It also puts into perspective Chelsea manager André Villas-Boas’ post-match comments. Unsurprisingly, Villas-Boas was highly critical of Hoy, accusing him of being “led by the emotions of the crowd”, clearly overlooking the fact that Chelsea’s two penalty shouts took place right in front of their own noisy, charged up, three thousand strong travelling support, and that Hoy chose not to send off David Luiz or John Terry despite justified encouragement from the home support.
Not surprisingly, the tone of Neil Warnock’s post-match comments contrasted sharply with that of Villas-Boas, with Warnock going as far as saying that the match marked “the finest day of his career”. This comment indicates, in no uncertain terms, the shock nature of the Rangers victory and the consequent sense of achievement. Since the two teams last met in the Premiership, in March 1996, Chelsea’s upwardly mobile progression within the game has largely run in parallel with Rangers’ fall from grace. Last season’s Championship victory and consequent promotion back to the Premiership promised a change to this trend, but even at the start of the season, a QPR victory over Chelsea, let alone Premiership survival still seemed highly unlikely. The fact that the former has been achieved, and that the ultimate goal of survival, at the time of writing, seems distinctly possible, is testament to the remarkable progress that has been made by the club in the last two months. Of course, much of the credit for this turnaround must be taken by Tony Fernandes and Amit Bhattia, the two men now at the helm of the club. Their efforts to open up clear and effective communication with the fans to ensure that the fans’ needs and opinions have been given due consideration has been much appreciated, particularly in light of the approach adopted by the previous régime at the club, which only served to antagonise and marginalise many loyal supporters. Their significant yet sound recent investment in the playing staff (resulting in probably the most exciting transfer deadline day in the club’s history!), and their sensible yet ambitious long-term planning has also been very well received.



No comments:
Post a Comment